A plea for descriptive and inquisitive intervention

In my last post I was pushing towards more care in how we articulate possible notions of faithfulness tied up in practices intimately linked with having a social awareness and engagement.  So how then does one articulate and engage the world when it is of course possible to undermine any given expression?  I think part of the shift is to not ‘over-code’ a given situation.  Simply living in the ‘hood and buying 2nd-hand and organic does not itself imply goodness.  How do we describe and articulate the network of relations that are at play in our actions?  Let the theology, if there is any, emerge from the material of our life and not impose the theology on it.  So the task, in my mind, becomes more descriptive and attentive.  This is not to say neutral or objective.  But open-ended or reflexive descriptive and inquiry will allow for ongoing modification and development.  What does this mean in specific situations.  One approach is a sort of journalistic posture.

I was walking home yesterday when I saw something that stood out.  A car was stopped at an angle in the middle of an intersection.  There were no other cars around so it did not look like a crash.  Then a saw someone helping another person to their feet.  My initial response was that someone had fallen and the driver stopped to help the person up.  The person being helped up looked a little frail and perhaps had a slight disability or something (though this of course could have been the result of the incident).  The driver then hopped back into her car and drove away.  I was not prepared for how to respond to this situation.  I asked someone afterwards if the car actually hit the woman on the street.  The person said yes.  I was initially not prepared to believe this or allow for it as a possibility.

Now in what follows I want to be clear that I am not advocating for a response and posture of authority never mind superiority that leads us to believe we know what is best in a given situation.  Rather, I am advocating for a sense of responsibility and insight.  So what would a descriptive and inquisitive intervention look like?  Well, it would begin with description and follow with inquiries.

I see this woman has fallen.  How did that happen?

Perhaps this seems stupid to make explicit.  But the reality is that I am a relatively confident person who has intervened in other awkward situations in the past.  But in this instance I did not.  What was the result of my not being able to simply make an observation and ask a question?  The result was, likely, yet another of the near infinite forms of how power is abused.  The driver (I am told) hit the woman.  A car driven by a white person with visibly more wealth hit an older woman of a visible minority in a neighbourhood with a high immigrant population (I of course need to speculate because I did not directly observe or inquire).  The driver then came out and helped the woman up.  You can walk so whatever happened was not toobad.  The driver got back into the car and drove away with no visible information shared (contact information and license plate number).

The wealthy know how to defend their property at all costs.  Just think of the intense scrutiny of a vehicle after the smallest fender-bender.  They then filter this through channels of insurance to make sure maximum compensation and protection is possible.  The woman in this instance was bodily struck.  She likely had little concept of our legal system and if she did the shock may not have allowed her to process this in the moment.  So the one in power aided the more vulnerable to her feet in weakened state.  This tends to be intervention of power and privilege.  We help people to their feet but in state that is weaker than they were before.  We strike them, not intentionally of course but they just sort of get in the way, then when this happens we feel bad, help them up, and carry on in our original goal.

My hope is that a descriptive intervention would have shown the woman who was struck that she was a neighbour deserving to be loved and also that if necessary the one in power can be held accountable by community who values one another.


3 thoughts on “A plea for descriptive and inquisitive intervention

  1. It would probably also be helpful to emphasize that this is not an attempt at a neutral posture. It is a posture towards or in favour of those who typically lose out in conflict. So I would enter into this situation with a particular hope of creating more space to attend to what happened to the person who appears to be visibly weaker. However, it may well have been the case that the woman on the street was having a bad day, walked out into traffic, started yelling and banging on the hood of a car, and the slipped and fell. I have seen similar scenarios. So the posture begins with an attending to power differential but must remain open to having that corrected or at least nuanced.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s